STEL - Revision history

InitHello: spelling

2005-01-26T10:30:41Z

spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 26 January 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:
	STEL was largely the creation of their opponents. The 4 alliances in question had some pre-round talks about being a block, and this was almost immediately public knowledge. [[The Triad]] had no comparable opponents with the disbanding [[Concordium]]/[[WaC]] and [[Blue Tuba]] in round 2. When the mere rumour of STEL emerged, it was hyped up to the point where STEL had no choice but to work together even though they were utterly unprepared to do so. Even up to the end they were squabbling at the top levels about whether they were even really allied or not.		STEL was largely the creation of their opponents. The 4 alliances in question had some pre-round talks about being a block, and this was almost immediately public knowledge. [[The Triad]] had no comparable opponents with the disbanding [[Concordium]]/[[WaC]] and [[Blue Tuba]] in round 2. When the mere rumour of STEL emerged, it was hyped up to the point where STEL had no choice but to work together even though they were utterly unprepared to do so. Even up to the end they were squabbling at the top levels about whether they were even really allied or not.

	STEL's failure to come out strong and fighting led directly to the stagnation of round 3. This was further ~~exascerbated~~ by PACrew refusing to end the round and [[Fury]]/[[Legion]] refusing to break their alliance until an end of round date was announced. This months long period of stagnation led to a mass exodus of players and a weak showing at the beginning of [[round 4]]. The beginning of Pay to Play at [[round 5]] sealed this trend towards decline in Planetarion's community.		STEL's failure to come out strong and fighting led directly to the stagnation of round 3. This was further exacerbated by PACrew refusing to end the round and [[Fury]]/[[Legion]] refusing to break their alliance until an end of round date was announced. This months long period of stagnation led to a mass exodus of players and a weak showing at the beginning of [[round 4]]. The beginning of Pay to Play at [[round 5]] sealed this trend towards decline in Planetarion's community.


	[[Category:Blocks]]		[[Category:Blocks]]

Banned at 07:13, 19 January 2005

2005-01-19T07:13:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 19 January 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:
	This block attempted to oppose [[The Triad]], but failed miserably.		This block attempted to oppose [[The Triad]], but failed miserably.

	~~Cayl says "~~STEL was largely the creation of their opponents. The 4 alliances in question had some pre-round talks about being a block, and this was almost immediately public knowledge. [[The Triad]] had no comparable opponents with the disbanding [[Concordium]]/[[WaC]] and [[Blue Tuba]] in round 2. When the mere rumour of STEL emerged, it was hyped up to the point where STEL had no choice but to work together even though they were utterly unprepared to do so. Even up to the end they were squabbling at the top levels about whether they were even really allied or not.		STEL was largely the creation of their opponents. The 4 alliances in question had some pre-round talks about being a block, and this was almost immediately public knowledge. [[The Triad]] had no comparable opponents with the disbanding [[Concordium]]/[[WaC]] and [[Blue Tuba]] in round 2. When the mere rumour of STEL emerged, it was hyped up to the point where STEL had no choice but to work together even though they were utterly unprepared to do so. Even up to the end they were squabbling at the top levels about whether they were even really allied or not.

	STEL's failure to come out strong and fighting led directly to the stagnation of round 3. This was further exascerbated by PACrew refusing to end the round and [[Fury]]/[[Legion]] refusing to break their alliance until an end of round date was announced. This months long period of stagnation led to a mass exodus of players and a weak showing at the beginning of [[round 4]]. The beginning of Pay to Play at [[round 5]] sealed this trend towards decline in Planetarion's community."		STEL's failure to come out strong and fighting led directly to the stagnation of round 3. This was further exascerbated by PACrew refusing to end the round and [[Fury]]/[[Legion]] refusing to break their alliance until an end of round date was announced. This months long period of stagnation led to a mass exodus of players and a weak showing at the beginning of [[round 4]]. The beginning of Pay to Play at [[round 5]] sealed this trend towards decline in Planetarion's community.


	[[Category:Blocks]]		[[Category:Blocks]]

Cayl at 07:09, 19 January 2005

2005-01-19T07:09:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:09, 19 January 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	This block attempted to oppose [[The Triad]], but failed miserably.		This block attempted to oppose [[The Triad]], but failed miserably.

			Cayl says "STEL was largely the creation of their opponents. The 4 alliances in question had some pre-round talks about being a block, and this was almost immediately public knowledge. [[The Triad]] had no comparable opponents with the disbanding [[Concordium]]/[[WaC]] and [[Blue Tuba]] in round 2. When the mere rumour of STEL emerged, it was hyped up to the point where STEL had no choice but to work together even though they were utterly unprepared to do so. Even up to the end they were squabbling at the top levels about whether they were even really allied or not.

			STEL's failure to come out strong and fighting led directly to the stagnation of round 3. This was further exascerbated by PACrew refusing to end the round and [[Fury]]/[[Legion]] refusing to break their alliance until an end of round date was announced. This months long period of stagnation led to a mass exodus of players and a weak showing at the beginning of [[round 4]]. The beginning of Pay to Play at [[round 5]] sealed this trend towards decline in Planetarion's community."


	[[Category:Blocks]]		[[Category:Blocks]]

213.93.89.122 at 00:56, 8 January 2005

2005-01-08T00:56:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 8 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Block for~~ Round 3 ~~that attempted to oppose [[Furgion~~]]~~. It failed drastically.~~		[[Round 3]] block, consisting of:

	~~It consisted of:~~
	*[[Sedition]]		*[[Sedition]]
	*[[The Empire]]		*[[The Empire]]
	*[[Elysium]]		*[[Elysium]]
	*[[LOST]]		*[[LOST]]

			This block attempted to oppose [[The Triad]], but failed miserably.

	[[Category:Blocks]]		[[Category:Blocks]]

82.37.92.37 at 22:40, 7 January 2005

2005-01-07T22:40:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 7 January 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*[[Elysium]]		*[[Elysium]]
	*[[LOST]]		*[[LOST]]

			[[Category:Blocks]]

82.37.92.37 at 22:33, 7 January 2005

2005-01-07T22:33:44Z

New page

Block for Round 3 that attempted to oppose [[Furgion]]. It failed drastically.

It consisted of:
*[[Sedition]]
*[[The Empire]]
*[[Elysium]]
*[[LOST]]