User talk:Banned - Revision history

Banned: Reverted edit of 220.68.43.107, changed back to last version by Banned

2006-06-06T13:11:19Z

Reverted edit of 220.68.43.107, changed back to last version by Banned

2006-06-06T12:25:48Z

2005-11-17T15:15:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:15, 17 November 2005
Line 21:		Line 21:

	[http://users.evtek.fi/~jussiava/pa/wiki_images.tar.gz pawiki pics] -[[User:Cheerios\|Cheerios]] 12:50, 17 November 2005 (GMT)		[http://users.evtek.fi/~jussiava/pa/wiki_images.tar.gz pawiki pics] -[[User:Cheerios\|Cheerios]] 12:50, 17 November 2005 (GMT)

			Thank you kindly, will find time to sort this over the weekend. I'll see what I can do about enabling user uploads while I'm at it. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 15:15, 17 November 2005 (GMT)

2005-11-17T12:50:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 17 November 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I obviously missed the reason using generalized pages is a good thing. The Terminology category page is already a tad spammed, we should strive to keep it clean enough to be useful. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 06:17, 30 Mar 2005 (BST)		I obviously missed the reason using generalized pages is a good thing. The Terminology category page is already a tad spammed, we should strive to keep it clean enough to be useful. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 06:17, 30 Mar 2005 (BST)


			----

			[http://users.evtek.fi/~jussiava/pa/wiki_images.tar.gz pawiki pics] -[[User:Cheerios\|Cheerios]] 12:50, 17 November 2005 (GMT)

2005-03-30T05:17:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, 30 March 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:

	In my mind they cover so much common ground that it would be redundant to have seperate pages for them. I agree that it would be nice to have them on the Terminology page, but this case is similar to many others: Races have one common page, Ship Types etc. If people search for attack, they get the Missions page. In most cases the attack and defense pages will be the ones linked, just like Zik/Cat/Ter/Xan are usually linked directly instead of Race. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 06:14, 30 Mar 2005 (BST)		In my mind they cover so much common ground that it would be redundant to have seperate pages for them. I agree that it would be nice to have them on the Terminology page, but this case is similar to many others: Races have one common page, Ship Types etc. If people search for attack, they get the Missions page. In most cases the attack and defense pages will be the ones linked, just like Zik/Cat/Ter/Xan are usually linked directly instead of Race. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 06:14, 30 Mar 2005 (BST)

			I obviously missed the reason using generalized pages is a good thing. The Terminology category page is already a tad spammed, we should strive to keep it clean enough to be useful. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 06:17, 30 Mar 2005 (BST)

2005-03-30T05:14:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 30 March 2005
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Thanks for tidying up the stuff I did yesterday, and adding stuff I can't believe I missed! However, I do think it might be a good idea to show such basic concepts as 'attack' and 'defend' in the index pages, which is why I made them seperate pages...?		Thanks for tidying up the stuff I did yesterday, and adding stuff I can't believe I missed! However, I do think it might be a good idea to show such basic concepts as 'attack' and 'defend' in the index pages, which is why I made them seperate pages...?

			In my mind they cover so much common ground that it would be redundant to have seperate pages for them. I agree that it would be nice to have them on the Terminology page, but this case is similar to many others: Races have one common page, Ship Types etc. If people search for attack, they get the Missions page. In most cases the attack and defense pages will be the ones linked, just like Zik/Cat/Ter/Xan are usually linked directly instead of Race. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 06:14, 30 Mar 2005 (BST)

2005-03-29T22:07:44Z

attack/defend

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 29 March 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Depends on what you mean by 'this' doesn't it. If you want to experiment, you can try the [[Help:Sandbox\|sandbox]]. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 01:35, 23 Mar 2005 (GMT)		Depends on what you mean by 'this' doesn't it. If you want to experiment, you can try the [[Help:Sandbox\|sandbox]]. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 01:35, 23 Mar 2005 (GMT)

			== attack/defend ==

			Thanks for tidying up the stuff I did yesterday, and adding stuff I can't believe I missed! However, I do think it might be a good idea to show such basic concepts as 'attack' and 'defend' in the index pages, which is why I made them seperate pages...?

2005-03-23T01:35:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 23 March 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	how does this work		how does this work

			Depends on what you mean by 'this' doesn't it. If you want to experiment, you can try the [[Help:Sandbox\|sandbox]]. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 01:35, 23 Mar 2005 (GMT)

2005-03-23T01:11:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, 23 March 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	No problem, I figured it was something like that. Glad you like it. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 21:19, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT)		No problem, I figured it was something like that. Glad you like it. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 21:19, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT)

			how does this work

2005-01-10T21:19:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 10 January 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	nice webby btw		nice webby btw

			No problem, I figured it was something like that. Glad you like it. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 21:19, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT)