Talk:The FAnG incident: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Not at all. People posting incorrect information as part of a larger post is a good thing. This article wouldn't have existed if it hadn't been posted with the misinformation. If just 1 person reads it, we've accomplished something. Wikis usually have misinformation corrected reasonably quickly, due to everyone being able to edit them. -[[User:Banned|Banned]] 00:55, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT) | Not at all. People posting incorrect information as part of a larger post is a good thing. This article wouldn't have existed if it hadn't been posted with the misinformation. If just 1 person reads it, we've accomplished something. Wikis usually have misinformation corrected reasonably quickly, due to everyone being able to edit them. -[[User:Banned|Banned]] 00:55, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT) | ||
Oh and Dukie, no it wasn't really necessary to start a discussion. An edit would've been fine for this, but if someone wants to vent, we don't really need to stop them. While articles are supposed to be topical and objective, talk pages are the place to be subjective and ranty. | |||
Revision as of 01:25, 10 January 2005
whoever pasted this, get your info right, it wasnt leff but webangel who pasted his info in #support - alch
I think that was stated in #pawiki when the article was added, but as no one was certain, LEFF was used. Now isn't this a bit pointless use of the discussion site? A wiki is made so that anyone can correct or add stuff... - Dukie
Discussions are healthy, as opposed to edit wars. -Banned 04:50, 9 Jan 2005 (GMT)
But is it really a discussion? It's merely a correction of a name, hardly worth any discussion as far as I can see... But nm that, doesn't really matter anyway -Dukie
1) i did edit, but i do think that if you arent sure about the information you are posting, then dont post it. - alch
Not at all. People posting incorrect information as part of a larger post is a good thing. This article wouldn't have existed if it hadn't been posted with the misinformation. If just 1 person reads it, we've accomplished something. Wikis usually have misinformation corrected reasonably quickly, due to everyone being able to edit them. -Banned 00:55, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT)
Oh and Dukie, no it wasn't really necessary to start a discussion. An edit would've been fine for this, but if someone wants to vent, we don't really need to stop them. While articles are supposed to be topical and objective, talk pages are the place to be subjective and ranty.
